“Staying Focused”

This article appeared in the October 2009 edition of Smart Business News.

James R. Klein is a firm believer that every CEO needs a “Radar O’Reilly,” just like the one Col. Potter had on the old TV series, “M*A*S*H.” Radar was always there to deflect some of the less important obligations to allow his boss to focus on what truly mattered at that moment, says the CEO of Finance Fund, a 24-employee nonprofit financial services firm.

“It’s somebody who manages your day-to-day schedule and becomes the triage that moves some of those pieces of minutiae somewhere else to a part of the system that wants to deal with it,” Klein says.

When you have that person in place, you can focus on the business and on keeping everyone in step with what it is you do best.

Smart Business spoke with Klein about how to keep your company aligned with its vision.

Q. What is the biggest hurdle to staying on track with your vision?

The main job of a leader is to be able to have a broader view of what is happening in your corporation. The complexity of this whole thing can be brought down to simple principles: Remember who you are. Know what you’re all about and what you’re trying to do and trying to accomplish. In organizational management, that’s called question zero. It’s the question you ask before you do anything else. You need to ask yourself that periodically, maybe like every morning.

Then you need to figure out what your role is. Have a good idea of who is working with you. Who is on your staff? What are their skills? What is their thought process like? You need to be able to have people you trust and give them specific tasks that you don’t have to micromanage.

What I mean by trust is, you need to be able to trust that what they are telling you is the truth. You don’t want people that are going to tell you what you want to hear. You want them to be able to tell you what the reality is whether you like it or not. You have to establish an environment that fosters that kind of reality.

If you don’t, you head off on a path that’s not real and you’ll find yourself in trouble.

Q. How do you engage these people in your vision?

Create an environment that entices employees to act on their own. If you’re a leader type that needs to be in on every decision, you create an environment that tests the edges of patience for everyone. The corporation becomes inflexible.

Have a number of different teams that have team leaders that have the job of directing thought and activity around certain parameters that you establish. Then you drive yourself to the next step.

Supervisors are encouraged to do things that attempt to maintain the entrepreneurial character of every position. We do that by just talking about it a lot and by looking for people who come with definite skill sets who are able to handle work tasking of particular positions.

But we also want people who have a broader view. They understand what the mission of the organization is or they are willing to listen and learn and get on board.

You can tell when an employee has a role that is changing from a job to a career. It seems as though their passion blooms. You can just begin to see how the passion for the mission begins to impact how they do their job.

Q. How do you ensure that your people really do hear you?

Those leaders that I have observed that are very good at it work hard at it. They establish relationships. They develop a reputation of knowing what they are talking about and being truthful and caring with their staff.

They are willing to concede that the staff is part of the whole mission you are presenting. They are not just an afterthought, but what they are is an essential piece of what you do. Leaders make them feel as though they do an important thing, whether they are putting labels on envelopes or they are saving lives, they all feel part of the whole.

What makes one leader go that way or one leader go a different direction? I think it’s a mix of personality and intelligence and really being able to be brutally honest with yourself.

I’ll tell you the honest truth. I’ve done some pretty stupid things in my time as a leader. There are some things I just wish I hadn’t done. You need to be brutally honest with yourself, admit those mistakes, learn from them and put your face to the wind again.

Q. What’s the secret to being a good communicator?

There is a distinct tendency to be insulated from what’s actually happening so the vision gets tied up in me and everybody else doesn’t get to hear about it.

I try to write every week into a blog that talks about where we are and what we are doing and how we’re thinking about things. That’s connected to everybody. It’s public, and we urge our staff to look at that. I also do writings that move to the staff about things that are coming up, ways we operate as a corporation, different strategies we would like to pursue.

I would like to have an environment that is free and open and trusting, but the environment becomes what it is. I have to put trust in certain leaders within my organization to move this message.

How to reach: Finance Fund, (614) 221-1114 or www.financefund.org

The Proper Thing to Do

I like to dress up. It’s very seldom that I don’t wear a coat and tie, which I believe is a piece of my past that continually pokes it head through my frame of reference. My maternal grandfather was English and a proper bloke. He came to the States at seventeen years old and never returned to Britain. He did, however keep a lot of England with him over the next six decades. To my knowledge he never came to the dinner table without his dinner jacket and tie. I remember asking him why after a long, dirty, tiring day farming why he would still change into his jacket before dinner. His answer was simple; “It is the proper thing to do.” And there you have it, some things are just the way they should be and others need help.

This is exactly what I thought when I read Mark Ferenchik’s piece in the Columbus Dispatch last Sunday, entitled “Retrofit city’s ‘inner-ring’ areas, planner says.” It points to Columbus’ struggle to redevelop inner ring neighborhoods or newer neighborhoods that are in decline. The article cites June Williamson who is scheduled to speak at the Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission’s Summit on Sustainability and the Environment at COSI Columbus. As Ferenchik mentions, “Williamson is co-author of the book Retrofitting Suburbia: Urban Design Solutions for Redesigning Suburbs, which discusses how some communities are redeveloping office parks, malls and housing subdivisions into vital centers for housing, stores, offices and mass transit.” It is an interesting article that provides a glimmer of hope for the renewal of urban communities.

Columbus, along with many other major American cities, has a tremendous opportunity to be a leader moving back to the concepts that made some of our declining neighborhoods vital and vibrant decades ago. The idea of a community made up of villages with access to services, shops, and entertainment is a model that went out of vogue in favor of commercial centers surrounded by high density housing. The idea of moving back to urban design that facilitates real neighborhoods is exciting. Ms. Williamson cites Lakewood, a Denver suburb, which demolished a distressed shopping mall replacing it with a village center, homes, shops and restaurants. In the winter the plaza is turned into a skating rink.

Architects have adapted this design for upscale suburban develops with recreation and community meeting space. The village design is well suited to the renewal of inner city neighborhoods creating opportunity for people to actually meet and know their neighbors. This type of interaction creates social constructs that play on the basic concept that some things are just the way they should be and others need help. Knowing your neighbor is different than just knowing who lives next door. It is my opinion that his is our next great urban challenge. “It is the proper thing to do.”

Welcome our new Chief Progam Officer: Moniqua Spencer

Finance Fund recently welcomed Moniqua Spencer to the position of Chief Program Officer. Moniqua brings with her 13 years of experience in the banking sector. In an effort to learn a little more about the role she’ll be playing within our team, we recently sat down and did a little Q&A where Moniqua talked about her goals and visions for her new position.

After 18 years in the private sector, and particularly in banking, what was the motivation for switching to the non-profit side of the world?

Switching from the private to the non-profit sector wasn’t the largest consideration. It was more about taking what I already knew about finance and commercial development, and coupling it with my passions. When I was at the Huntington National Bank we had an internal initiative called Huntington Hometown Partnership. It was the bank’s plan to meet a $250MM commitment in residential loans, community development, and small business lending, as a part of Mayor Michael Coleman’s 21st Century City Initiative. I was the point person in the small business lending area. Part of our goal was to make our lending more prudent in low-to-moderate income areas. We realized that when lending in re-developed or economically depressed areas, customers don’t necessarily fit in the established underwriting “box.” We worked to adjust guidelines and find partners like Finance Fund.

In essence, my biggest switch will be staying mission focused and less profit driven. Although, I will review projects with a business mind set because at the end of the day, it’s of no benefit to Finance Fund and the community at large if we lose money.

What makes you most anxious about taking this new direction in your career?

The stability of non-profit funding sources – and the future comfort level of those sources.

Additionally, after being with an organization for 13 years, you are a bit on cruise control when it comes to knowing the internal systems. Now, I’m starting over again from learning the voicemail system to new products and services. I am in the process of learning how to be focused on our bottom line, while not making decisions that will compromise our mission.

The banking industry has obviously gone through many changes in the last few years. What was the hardest loss you saw during that time? What was the greatest lesson you were granted?

The hardest lesson learned is making sure that you stay in your own back yard (rather than follow customers out of market where you don’t have a presence). There are some times when you want to say yes – that you have to say no. I also learned a great lesson on how to do business: the way you do it in the bad times is how you need to do it in the good times.

Finance Fund has a unique position within the State of Ohio. Given what you’ve learned about it in your few short weeks on the job, what’s your greatest hope for where it will head in the next 10 years?

We are a sideline partner right now. We want to be on the field playing with everyone else. This means being more proactive in the effort to re-invigorate historically economically depressed areas – and being very “loud” about how we can help you. We miss opportunities to impact communities every day by not being on the field. Bankers need to know that we are here and we can help diffuse exposures and give creativity to a project.

Lastly, as someone that will have the distinct opportunity to report to Jim Klein, how will you “herd his cats” of ideas?

Jim reminds me of a lot of small business owners I worked with over the years. I’m going to take his vision, and work hard to actualize it – with him and for him. I’m a thorough researcher – I am likely to pick up an idea that he threw out and check it out. No idea is a solution until we’ve proven it to be or not.

I have a checklist to make sure I know if I should propel a project along the line. What is the project, planning stages; I will communicate to the potential client what I need from them to be able to help them.

I will say no quickly so that I won’t string out any potential project for months and months. And when I say no, it will always be with a path to get to “yes” or clear reasons why it couldn’t be done.

Community Banks Invited to Invest Now

Editor’s Note:  This post is from Valerie Heiby, our Director of Development.

We have all heard how market conditions and increased competition have affected the health of Ohio’s community banking sector and the quality and availability of banking products and services. But in this economy, it’s imperative to find new ways to do business. Investing in Finance Fund’s New Markets Tax Credit (NMTC) program is one way to add to your bottom line, increase your CRA benefit and create economic development in your community.

Finance Fund works to enable progress and inspire change within Ohio’s low-income communities. Our clients include nonprofit organizations and for-profit businesses. The NMTC program is in line with Finance Fund’s mission to “…build bridges between resources and the low-income community.”  We do that by partnering with banks to provide credit to business borrowers (for-profit & nonprofit) for fixed assets in qualifying low-income census tracks. As our bank partner, your clients have access to capital with lower payments, you have a tool to share or lower risk, and your investment in the community builds assets giving rise to stronger businesses.

It’s simple really. The NMTC program permits taxpayers (that would be you) to receive a credit against Federal income taxes for making qualified equity investments in designated Community Development Entities (CDE: that would be Finance Fund). These investments are then used by Finance Fund to provide credit for in development projects low-income communities.

These investments are used in low income census tract communities for business, real estate and community facility projects that create or retain jobs, stabilize neighborhoods and spurn further economic development, such as the Heritage Square Marketplace and Noble Learning Center.

Finance Fund has been using this program since 2004, and at the close of 2008 has leveraged $212 million on an investment of $44.5 million for 25 projects creating 1,249 full-time jobs and serving 536 children within Ohio’s low income communities.
We invite you to contact us today to find out more about how your community bank can invest with Finance Fund’s New Markets Tax Credit program.

Miami Valley Head Start Facility Welcomes Renovations

It was bound to happen. Today I walked into a discussion of diapers. Being old school I place diapers in four general categories; cloth/disposable and empty/full but come to find out there are all kinds of sub groups of the first categorization and all kinds of options for the second. It appears “diaper” technology has leaped ahead. It is my hope that other technologies that help children develop and learn will experience the same leap. I’m encouraged by some examples.

 

We recently funded a renovation of the Kings Highway Head Start project, a part of the Miami Valley Child Development Centers Inc. This is one of many projects that Finance Fund has been privileged to work with. Those that know me, know I’m a passionate advocate for Head Start and this one was no exception.

 

Miami Valley Child Development Centers, Inc. serves Clark, Madison and Montgomery Counties in Ohio. Their overall goal is to prepare children, ages zero to five years, to be successful students when they enter kindergarten. Programs work holistically with families and children, balancing parent involvement, health and nutrition, social skills, literacy, and numeracy development. More than just a childcare center, Miami Valley Child Development Centers empower families by teaching parenting and life skills.

 

When our program team met with Miami Valley Child Development Centers, Inc., we saw their need to repair and renovate their Kings Highway facility. Using New Markets Tax Credit funding, the repairs and overhaul at Kings Highway MVCDC are underway and should be completed in October. As you can see in these pictures, the improved facility will soon provide a safe, clean and happy learning environment for the children of Montgomery County.

 

The Kings Highway MVCDC Entrance

The Kings Highway MVCDC Entrance

   

Renovated Bathroom at MVCDC

Renovated Bathroom at MVCDC

 

Hallway at MVCDC

Hallway at MVCDC

 

Stay tuned for updates on the upcoming celebration for the improved facility. And in the meantime, if you are Head Start seeking assistance in enhancing your facility, contact us. Call at 614.221.1114 or send me an e-mail at jrklein@financefund.org.

 

Community Banks: The Essential Piece to Community Development

The tough times we face today because of the recession are not unfamiliar to individuals throughout Ohio. In many of Ohio’s communities, the day-to-day realities of financial stress are a constant companion. Finance Fund works with many organizations to help improve the lives of Ohioans living in distressed urban and rural areas. However, much of this work could not be done without community banks. Some wonderful examples of this work are located here

 

Community banks are a valuable resource to neighborhoods and families throughout Ohio because of their investments locally. Think back to the classic film It’s a Wonderful Life where George Bailey, played by Jimmy Stewart, fights to keep his savings and loan afloat to save his community. Of course this is a Hollywood example, but it does demonstrate the basic principal of a community bank. Their local investments and interests make community banks a vital part of Ohio’s neighborhoods.

 

As noted by the Independent Community Bankers of America community banks “focus attention on the needs of local families, businesses and farmers.” Officers at community banks are typically involved in local community affairs and work for a small business, making their focus more community-centric. Also, because their loan decisions are made locally, they can quickly provide funding that benefits their communities. Locally, the Community Bankers Association of Ohio does great work through advocacy and support to promote the interests of the state’s community banks.

 

Community banks often encounter challenges in providing the financing required to fund projects. These come from providing enough financing to have a major impact in a severely disadvantaged or distressed community. Or issuing loans for projects considered marginal, either due to location in low- to moderate-income areas, lean size, lack of established credit or risk potential.

 

The great news for community banks is that there are programs available that bridge the financing and risk gap to bring these projects to fruition. Numerous programs and tools exist to help community banks leverage their existing funds. These include New Markets Tax Credits, linked deposit programs, predevelopment grants and economic development grants. These tools help community banks fund projects by reducing risk and allowing them to underwrite deals that promote community and business development. Finance Fund continues to partner with community banks in their efforts to serve as community champions.

 

If you’re a community bank looking for a partner to invest in your community, give me a call at 614.221.1114.

A Lesson in Cognitive Development

As Ohio families get ready to send their children back to school, I can’t help but reflect on how our society treats its youngest members. What long-term impact will our education and childcare systems have on future generations? A study from the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development found that children in the United States score less proficiently on education exams than numerous other developed countries. Much speculation and research surround this issue, including the importance of cognitive development during the first few years of life.

 

The famous psychologist, Jean Piaget, explained that child’s play is not just fun, it is an important part of their brain development. Other studies validate Piaget’s statement, showing that the first years of a child’s life determine the trajectory of their cognitive, emotional and interpersonal issues.

 

We must then ask ourselves how this impacts the cognitive development of economically-disadvantaged children with limited access to early childhood education. Unfortunately, the answer is not surprising. A recent study by Child Trends found that underprivileged children typically lag behind other children as young as nine months old. Those of us working toward improving the viability of low-income communities should be particularly mindful of this staggering information.

 

So what can be done in Ohio to ensure all children have access to opportunity? For one, we can invest in improving childcare. We cannot subject young children to emotional anorexia and expect their cognitive skills to develop effectively. A study from the National Center for Early Development & Learning found that quality child care was critical in ensuring that a child is ready for elementary school both cognitively and behaviorally. Essentially, child-teacher bonds formed in the childcare classroom prepare children for their future education.

 

We must make providing access to early childhood centers in our communities a priority. Both funding and resources are available to make this a reality. For example, Finance Fund had the pleasure of helping to fund the first and only early childhood center in Noble County. The Noble Learning Center had struggled for some time to find a stable location, operating out of rented apartments and struggling to keep its lease. Through creative funding, the Noble Learning Center was able to reclaim a vacant building and now operates as the four-county region’s only licensed childcare center. Projects like these improve opportunities for children in our communities to fully engage in their education.

 

As you begin to see school buses and school playgrounds fill with children, take a moment to ask yourself an important question. What can you do to ensure that all children are provided with the opportunity to learn and ultimately succeed? It’s imperative to our future.

Execution as learning? Interesting approach.

As some of you know, I’m fairly new to this leadership thing… I’ve only been doing it for about 30+ years. I am always interested to hear how others approach leadership, management and productivity issues in their organizations. This was a new one for me and I thought I’d share.

 

The Competitive Imperative of Learning (Harvard Business Review July-August 2008), by Amy C. Edmondson

Most executives believe that relentless execution – the efficient, timely, consistent production and delivery of goods or services – is the surefire path to customer satisfaction and financial results. Managers who let up on execution even briefly, the assumption goes, do so at their peril.

                In fact, even flawless execution cannot guarantee enduring success in the knowledge economy. The influx of new knowledge in most fields makes it easy to fall behind.  Look at General Motors which was the largest most profitable company in the world in the 1970. GM remained wedded to a well-developed competency in centralized control and high-volume execution. They have steadily lost ground for decades and are now counted in the ranks of high profile bankruptcies.

                Edmondson’s research identifies a different approach to execution, what she calls “Execution-as-learning ”. The approach maintains that a focus on getting things done, and done right, crowds out the experimentation and reflection vital to sustainable success. By continuing to think about execution as efficiency, which she refers to as old fashioned and narrow, companies fall into predictable self sabotaging traps.

1.       Critical information and ideas fail to rise to the top

2.       People don’t have enough time to learn

3.       Unhealthy internal competition arises

4.       Companies think they can do no wrongr0807e_a

In addition the environment must be made safe. Before an execution-as-learning can occur organizations must foster psychological safety. This means ensuring that no one is penalized if they ask for help or admit a mistake. This safety is not done at the expense of accountability and Edmondson presents a safety/accountability matrix which suggests that effective organizations achieve high levels of both.

        The goal of the approach is to find out what works and what doesn’t; employees must absorb new knowledge while executing, often sacrificing short term efficiency to gain insight into and respond to novel problems. The author reveals four steps to make this happen.

1.       Provide process guidelines

2.       Provide tools that enable employees to collaborate in real time

3.       Collect process data

4.       Institutionalize disciplined reflection

 

The article presents a valid and viable alternative that strikes a median between hierarchy and self guided teams. Fostering an atmosphere in which trust and respect thrive, and flexibility and innovation flourish, pays off in most settings, even the most deadline driven. When people know their ideas are welcome, they will offer innovative ways to lower costs and improve quality, thus laying a more solid foundation for their organization’s success.

 

You can read the full article here.

 

Lies and apathy (Naked again)

We all come naked from the womb, but most of us do not stay that way. Yet again I am amazed at the rhetoric flying about the airwaves and the halls of congress concerning the Shangri-La or inferno of revamping the U.S. health care system. It’s not the topic that is disconcerting but how the opinion of the American public is so easily swayed by any titillating story, whether true or false, and how easily we are lured away for meaningful debate into the afternoon soap opera. My example is not taken to focus on any one point of view because the tactic is used by all sides of the issue.

On the radio show hosted by former Sen. Fred Thompson, New York lieutenant governor Betsy McCaughey stated that the House’s proposed health care bill contained a provision that would institute mandatory counseling sessions telling seniors how “to do what’s in society’s best interest…and cut your life short.” Citing page 425 of the bill, McCaughey claimed that “the Congress would make it mandatory … that every five years, people in Medicare have a required counseling session that will tell them how to end their life sooner, how to decline nutrition, how to decline being hydrated, how to go into hospice care … all to do what’s in society’s best interest … and cut your life short.”

Here’s what the bill says, “An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title.” The accepted definition of end-of-life planning means thinking ahead about the care you would like to receive at the end of your life – which may include the choice to reject extraordinary measures of life support, or the choice to embrace them.  The section would require Medicare to pay for, not mandate, some end-of-life planning counseling sessions with a health care practitioner once every 5 years. It is clear that McCaughey’s distorted interpretation of the content of page 425 was offered not to stimulate debate but to frame an atmosphere of fear and mistrust.

Several television ads sponsored by Patients United Now claim that Canadian citizens survived serious illness only by leaving the country to get treatment in the U.S. because of the length of their wait for service in the Canadian health care system, claiming “Washington wants to bring Canadian-style health care to the U.S.” The reality is that no one is advocating for a government run health care system. The president and the leaders of both parties resound with the words of Sen. Max Baucus, Chair of Finance Committee, “single-payer (government run health care) is not going to get even to first base.” Yet the ads continue for what purpose? Not to stimulate debate but to frame an atmosphere of fear and mistrust.

There was a time in this country that I can remember when someone or some group publically making a misstatement or an outright lie, the journalistic community would stand up on their hind legs and demand accountability, and there was an American public that had not abdicated their role in the republic and given place to apathy believing everything we are fed. Naked again.

Paying attention to Renewable Energy

Treasury and DOE Accepting Applications for Section 1603 Renewable Energy Grant Program

Sure you know what the 1603 program is.   You don’t?    In fact, we’re pretty sure that you who follow our messages about CDFI and New Markets Tax Credit won’t immediately relate to this important announcement.  But the Finance Fund has been looking into ways to participate in renewable energy initiatives as it is indeed aligned with our mission.   In that spirit, we thought the availability of $3 billion was worth sharing.    If you have ideas or interest in this topic, let us know.  In the meantime, here are some links to learn more about this new initiative.

The U.S. Department of Treasury and the U.S. Department of Energy announced recently that they are accepting applications for a federal cash grant program that will make direct payments to eligible renewable energy project owners in lieu of federal income tax credits.

With the goal of expanding the development of renewable energy projects throughout the United States and creating new jobs, The U.S. Government anticipates distributing at least $3 billion in financial support to approximately 5,000 bio-mass, solar, wind, and other types of renewable energy production facilities.

The funding for this grant program has been made available through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 which authorizes Treasury to make direct payments to companies that create and place in service renewable energy facilities beginning January 1, 2009.  Previously, these companies could only file for a federal income tax credit to cover a portion of the renewable energy project’s cost.

Under the Section 1603 grant program, applicants may elect to forgo future tax credits in favor of an immediate cash reimbursement for a portion of the property expense.