1. Funding authority to catalyze high levels of private investment in distressed communities. The Administration proposes to authorize NMTC at $5 billion in 2010 and 2011.
2. Improving overall competitiveness, attractiveness and effectiveness of the NMTC.
   1. Allowing Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT) taxpayers to claim NMTC.
   2. Review passive activity rules, which is a rule that limits the use of losses and credits for business in which a taxpayer does not materially participate.
   3. Qualification of certain types of investments for the credit, which seeks to clarify what types of loans constitute a qualified investment.
   4. Improvement of NMTC rules to spur additional investment in small business.
      1. Re-examining “substantially all” requirements, which requires an awardee (CDE) to have a specific portion of their funds invested at all times.
      2. Supporting greater investment in institutions that invest in small businesses by supporting new rules to promote more investment in Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFIs).

In addition to the “formal” proclamation of the press release, on the conference call Treasury officials made concerted effort to point out that NMTC has Secretary Geithner’s support and is a high priority for the Administration. Bob Rapoza, representing the NMTC Coalition, expressed the industries appreciation that Treasury is moving aggressively on these issues that will strengthen the program.

It’s good to hear good news once in a while.

PRESS RELEASE and FACT SHEET:

http://treas.gov/press/releases/reports/nmtc%20fact%20sheet.pdf

Mark Pinsky, President & CEO of Opportunity Finance Network, the nation’s CDFI network, hailed this move as a step in the right direction, but stressed that CDFI loan funds should share in this money, too:
Community development banks and credit unions deliver capital and services where other financial institutions don’t. This program is a capital lever that can lift up thousands of businesses that need credit to thrive. The CDFIs that participate will make capital flow where it’s not flowing today. Last October, the President expressed a desire to support non-depository as well as depository CDFIs. The next step is clear: extend support to CDFI loan funds and venture funds.

At Finance Fund, we echo this position and advocate for a similar program for non-regulated CDFI loan funds. Why? Because Finance Fund is a certified CDFI, which provides us with access to financial and technical award assistance from the federal CDFI Fund. Since its inception in 1994, assistance has totaled more than $500 million for community development. As a CDFI, we’re recognized as a financial organization with a primary mission of promoting community development in under-served communities in the United States, through credit, capital, and financial services.

CDFIs are a vital way that under-served communities achieve economic development and neighborhood revitalization. And considering the recessionary climate we’re in today, now is the time to bolster business and economic development by providing CDFIs (like Finance Fund) with the resources to leverage more capital to resurrect strong businesses and communities. This ruling is positive, but CDFIs need the financial covering of T.A.R.P. funds, too.

On the radio show hosted by former Sen. Fred Thompson, New York lieutenant governor Betsy McCaughey stated that the House’s proposed health care bill contained a provision that would institute mandatory counseling sessions telling seniors how “to do what’s in society’s best interest…and cut your life short.” Citing page 425 of the bill, McCaughey claimed that “the Congress would make it mandatory … that every five years, people in Medicare have a required counseling session that will tell them how to end their life sooner, how to decline nutrition, how to decline being hydrated, how to go into hospice care … all to do what’s in society’s best interest … and cut your life short.”

Here’s what the bill says, “An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title.” The accepted definition of end-of-life planning means thinking ahead about the care you would like to receive at the end of your life – which may include the choice to reject extraordinary measures of life support, or the choice to embrace them.  The section would require Medicare to pay for, not mandate, some end-of-life planning counseling sessions with a health care practitioner once every 5 years. It is clear that McCaughey’s distorted interpretation of the content of page 425 was offered not to stimulate debate but to frame an atmosphere of fear and mistrust.

Several television ads sponsored by Patients United Now claim that Canadian citizens survived serious illness only by leaving the country to get treatment in the U.S. because of the length of their wait for service in the Canadian health care system, claiming “Washington wants to bring Canadian-style health care to the U.S.” The reality is that no one is advocating for a government run health care system. The president and the leaders of both parties resound with the words of Sen. Max Baucus, Chair of Finance Committee, “single-payer (government run health care) is not going to get even to first base.” Yet the ads continue for what purpose? Not to stimulate debate but to frame an atmosphere of fear and mistrust.

There was a time in this country that I can remember when someone or some group publically making a misstatement or an outright lie, the journalistic community would stand up on their hind legs and demand accountability, and there was an American public that had not abdicated their role in the republic and given place to apathy believing everything we are fed. Naked again.

But before, in haste, I fall on the sword of rhetoric I remembered another inaugural address from eight years ago. This administration will embody “a new commitment to live out our nation’s promise through civility, courage, compassion, and character.” We will “show purpose without arrogance…Civility is not a tactic or a sentiment. It is a determined choice of trust over cynicism, or community over chaos.” Even as these uplifting words were being delivered eight years ago, that new administration was in the process of demonstrating that its intentions were less than compassionate and more than conservative.

It’s with sadness that I withhold judgment of this new set of lofty ideals. The proof is in the “putting” our money where his mouth is.